What would have happened if she had never lost those jewels? Despite the fulfillment of her greatest how to open into a research paper dreams and the vanities of her pride, this is reduced to nothing as she and her husband must now struggle to find and buy diamonds to replace the lost necklace. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. Madame Loisels pride and vanity are very large to her stature. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry.
Free, the, necklace by, guy de, maupassant, essay
But mine was imitation. The implication is that Madame Loisel does not posses the characteristics of a woman of high social standing. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. This is the ultimate ironic twist and puts the entire story into perspective. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Guy de Maupassant is taking a critical view of a womans pride and vanity. At the beginning of the story Madam Mathilde Loisel was craving a life of luxury, a life that she felt that she rightfully deserved. How strange life is, how fickle!
How to conclude an english essay
Men are at the mercy of events essay
Watanabe kazan essays