of project funding in the area of climate change and health. (3) There is no such a thing as a new, or even typical climate disease. Theses universities are joined by the indepth-network. The course is targeted to doctoral students and postdocs from everywhere wishing to study the impact of climate change on a disorder. Finally, academic institution need to step up to the task and create careers, from junior research groups to senior positions. The second set of arguments is of more methodological nature. Research funding organizations need to raise the number and volume of their calls in this arena. Unfortunately, we do a bad job at teaching the topic in a systematic way at our universities, West, East, North and South: my last count was 5 accredited formal short courses of 13-weeks durations worldwide on climate change and health.
Theses universities are joined by the indepth-network.
Org, as well as the.
(4) The new risk factor climate change increases roughly exponentially over decades. This course is currently being developed by scientists of various disciplines from 7 universities: Harvard, Heidelberg, Charit Medical School (Berlin the London School of Hygiene, Nottingham, Paris Descartes/Sorbonne-Cit, and Ume. One is about human brainpower: We need to interest and enroll the sharpest scientific minds into this scientific challenge. The challenge is therefore to aggregate both mortality and morbidity impacts of a single disease under study, or ideally of all climate sensitive-diseases into a comprehensive, population-based metric for health outcomes, such as dalys or qalys. What are some pathways to solve these problems? Massive Open Online Courses (mmocs) can quickly disseminate knowledge and convey skills. This, however, is the focus of a new mooc on Research Methods for Studying Climate Change Health. Hence, no prospective observational study can be helpful in the time horizon that funders are willing to contemplate,.e.